The Business of Finding Amelia Earhart
|…and business is good. But what’s even better is Jerry Adler’s new piece on the amateur “archaeologists” and the strange world they’ve built around the never-ending search for Amelia Earhart.
Will the Search for Amelia Earhart Ever End?
Nearly eight decades after she disappeared in the South Pacific, the aviator continues to spark intense passion—and controversy
Amelia Earhart-related nonsense reached a fever pitch in late October when a group announced they’d identified a piece of wreckage as belonging to her aircraft. This aluminum debris was first recovered in 1991 from the island at Nikumaroro. The identification process was described as exacting and forensic in nature, a “complex fingerprint” of proportions and patterns, unique to Earhart’s lost Electra. But such sweeping claims come with a price–scrutiny.
Adler’s article is here and is well worth dropping whatever you’re doing right now to read. My favorite quotes are below:
Anyone who thinks his new data will settle the question of what happened to Earhart, though, hasn’t been paying attention for the last 78 years. Other researchers have studied the same rivet holes and radio transcripts and come to radically different conclusions—and they’re not conceding anything.
These are not other theorists with competing theories. Many of the people calling foul on these theories are the umpires–the ones with the job of wading through the evidence (and tall tales) and making fact-based determinations.
Since 1989 TIGHAR has mounted ten expeditions to the South Pacific, and he is seeking money for an 11th. His fund-raising prowess and mediagenic announcements have made Gillespie an object of envy and occasional vitriol among his fellow Earhart researchers—a group that includes serious historians as well as wild-eyed obsessives, who pile up scraps of evidence into conspiracies reaching right up to the White House… So the simplest explanation, and the official version, of her disappearance: Unsure of her location and out of fuel, she crashed and sank in the 18,000-foot-deep waters northwest of Howland Island… “Crashed-and-sank” was the conclusion of Elgen Long, a veteran military and commercial pilot, who with his wife, Marie, spent 25 years researching their book Amelia Earhart: The Mystery Solved. It remains the simplest explanation, but for that very reason, has attracted derision from those who prefer their history complicated.
“Prefer their history complicated”… and make a name for themselves in doing so.
“I think if Ric proved anything, it’s that [Earhart and Noonan] never were close to that island,” says Tom Crouch, senior curator of aeronautics at the National Air and Space Museum. “Otherwise he would have found something definitive. Ric is in the business of taking wealthy people on an archaeological adventure, Indiana Jones-style.”
Agreed. It’s not going to be ‘case closed’ until her airplane is discovered, most likely in deep water. Someone’s going to do it someday, I just hope it’s before Earhart’s legacy is any further tarnished by the conspiracy theorists.
Good article, but I must ask how could Earhart’s legacy be tarnished any further? The official line (and what you propose) is that she drove her aircraft into the ocean in such a nose low attitude that the impact ruptured all six fuel tanks in the cabin, tore the wings off and continued down 18,000 feet to the bottom. It would have taken that kind of impact to account for the fact that not a single, empty,aluminium fuel tank made it to the surface. It is hard to imagine that anything but a full power on vertical dive could have accomplished that feat. I know that you or some of your readers are going to point to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappearing without a trace, but the fuselage of that aircraft was filled with passengers, not empty aluminium fuel tanks.
Ric Gillespie would have us believe that she landed intact on Gardner Island and died less than seven days later. Gillespie fails to mention that she had access to the supplies left on the island by the crew of the SS Norwich City, eight years earlier. That is not to mention birds that were so curious and tame that you could grab one by the neck and have it for supper. Crabs, fish, coconuts and (in a pinch) rats were also available. The crew of the Lady be Good lasted 21 days in the North African desert with no food and only a canteen of water each. Ric would also have us believe that if it isn’t a coconut, bird, crab or rat it must have been brought to Gardner Island by Amelia Earhart.
So, it is my understanding that Miss Earhart’s legacy should be one of an amateur aviator who panicked with four hours of fuel remaining and drove her aircraft into the ocean so ineptly that not one piece of wreckage has ever surfaced? Or that she simply sat down in the sand on Gardner Island and starved to death without any hope of rescue (an SOS in the sand would have been a nice touch)? Therefore, I must disagree with you about tarnishing her legacy. It already looks pretty bad from where I stand. Further investigation, no matter how far “outside the box” couldn’t do any more harm than the official version of events or Gillespie’s ravings have already done to this great lady.
Appreciate your perspective, but I believe your take on the “official line” is a little misleading. Why would it have to be a powered dive? Soft-landed planes with empty tanks still sink. And because debris wasn’t found doesn’t mean nothing made it to the surface. Most mainstream historians believe she died taking on an ambitious challenge and are pretty kind to her memory. In my opinion, strange theories about the pair as castaways or spies remain wholly unsupported, and their proponents oftentimes more concerned with their own public profile than finding the truth.
I have followed these theories for some time and although I would like to think she died on the island I strongly doubt she could have made it there ..and her mayday calls ended at a certain point …no fuel and i believe she crashed off Howland Island..